Letter to the Editor: Which is considered terrorism?

6

Dear Editor,

Please forgive my ignorance of the term “terrorism” Can you explain which of the undermentioned incident/s will be classified as terrorism?

  1. The slaughter of innocent Guyanese citizens at Lusignan, Lindo Creek and Bartica; incidentally the perpetrators of the Lusignan massacre were defended in court by the AFC Nigel Hughes. Isn’t this aiding terrorists and hypocrisy by the leader of the AFC?
  2. The daily attacks on persons and their property on ECD, Linden and Agricola when insurgents supported by the former Commissioner of Police, now member of parliament, and the lawyers of AFC who sought to create several diversions.
  3. The daily robberies committed against innocent citizens, where they are threatened by guns, knives, beaten and sometimes raped. Then to add insult to injury, when these criminals are caught, they are readily defended by the lawyers of AFC and APNU.

Can we equate the above with statements made by the A.G., most of which are true and consider them both as terrorism?

Please clarify.

Mohamed Ikbal

6 COMMENTS

  1. which is worst, that which you have mentioned above or the situation with the AG and the reporter at kaieteur news, noting in your review that that media house lost some members in a previous attack. after hearing the tape the DPP claim there is no evidence to proceed with. my take is that the AG was aware that the case was weak, but instead of accepting blame chooses to discredit Nigel.

  2. Just check the elections pattern over 45 yrs. The opposition always use violence to intimidate and kill and its just before any elections. Its a pattern . know your history don’t be an accomplice. Speak the truth. The top criminals are former security services personnel who engage in the terror for political gains. The govt is not perfect, yes there needs to be changes but not at the expense of the innocent lives. All lives matter .Rather than being divisive, stand up for the truth and what is right . Build bridges, don’t burn them .

  3. Thank you,i have been saying this and the mouth pieces for the PPP talking about 28 yrs,,,we need to go foward and they need to tell the Minister that they murder family who kill him, lots wont like your blog, but the truth is going to be told and justice will be done ,,,

  4. is it a fair trial when the law ask if lawyers or jurors know each other..come again big T…nighell and the jury foreman were buddies..can u denty dat/

  5. Are you for real. the slaughter of innocent Guyanese citizens at Lusignan, Lindo Creek and Bartica; were perpetrated by the PPP/C government sponsored terrorism department.

    The daily robberies committed against innocent citizens, where they are threatened by guns, knives, beaten and sometimes raped. This is allowed to continued by the inept management by the incompetent Home Affairs Minister Rohee who the PPP/C government refuses to fire for incompetence. This is what you called PPP/C state sponsored terrorism. The Nandall Issue highlights it even further that the PPP/C government is state sponsored terrorist group.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.